Madera Labs | My Rejected Proposal for Interaction ’11

My Rejected Proposal for Interaction ’11

Weekly User Experience Tips
Free weekly recaps of our blog, straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Like many in the interaction design community, my proposed session for Interaction 2011 was unfortunately rejected.  At first, I was pretty bummed about it, but after seeing the ranks of people I’m with (some of my heros in the community), I don’t feel as bad.  The conference will certainly be unreal.

Meanwhile, taking a cue from Whitney Hess (@whitneyhess) and David Farkas (@dafark8), I thought I’d post my submission here for comment.  This talk centers around something I’ve been spending a lot of time thinking and talking informally about, and I’m looking forward to giving it as a formal presentation at some point in the near future (Are you organizing a conference?  Like this idea for a talk?  Give me a shout.)

Anyway, per Whitney, I want to use this as an opportunity to improve the quality of this talk idea, so I encourage comments and thoughts about this as a topic.

And if you’re going to Interaction ’11, I’ll see you there!  Let’s grab a beer and chat.

Here’s the session:

Design Over Time: How Adaptive Interfaces Can Create Remarkable Experiences

So many of our interactions with interfaces are tantamount to amnesic episodes – passing experiences that show no respect for our history with the object, leaving us to restart our relationship from scratch each time.

The design of interactions over time is about recognizing the relationship between the actor and object, and designing to acknowledge and enhance that relationship beyond an atomic interaction.  As designers, if we can think of the scale of time as a major design criterion, we can craft experiences that are evolutionary and more engaging for our users.  Unfortunately, most interfaces today aren’t designed with this relationship in mind, instead preferring to reset at zero each time we interact.

This session will focus on designing interfaces that adapt to a user over time to enhance that user’s experience.  From better grocery checkout experiences to smarter internet browsing, we’ll look at where user behavior data can be leveraged to create more engaging and personalized experiences.

The goals of the session will be to provide context around how to think about time in terms of interaction design, identify areas of opportunity that are common across various design applications with regards to leveraging behavior data over time to design experiences, and leave the audience with a framework for identifying these opportunities in their projects.

  • guest

    Hi, posting your ideas is a great idea!! I hope more people do what you are doing. Here's my two cents about your work.

    I imagine the people in charge of crafting the agenda for IXD11 wanted to present truly novel work. Your ideas are great, but research exists in this area.
    See Gaver's “History Tablecloth,” http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1142405.1142437.
    Zach Pousman at GaTech has also done some interesting research in this area. To get you started.

    A challenge I see within the IXDA community is that too often practitioners overlook prior research examining areas they see as novel and unexplored.

  • maderalabs

    Thanks for the comment! I agree with you – I'm sure the IXD11 screeners are looking for truly novel work. With that said, I feel like at times we get ahead of ourselves in some of these conferences. While I see the value in talking about brand new ground (and honestly, I love these conversations), other work that has been researched before has yet to make its way into popular interactive situations.

    My goal with the adaptive interactions talk was to reignite the conversation behind this idea, in hopes that we might actually see some consumer-facing products employing these concepts. Theory and futuristic talk is fun (and a great opportunity for growth), but market-facing products are still missing some of the basic ideas, and I think as a community, we ought to work harder to get our ideas about interaction into the hands of actual consumers on a wide scale.

    I really appreciate the comment, and would love to continue the conversation. Thanks for the links to the research you mentioned!

    Thanks again, hope to talk soon!